This % is of the total supply. If you look closely the actual percentage of the dev fund which is burnt is bolded under each option.
I will get ahead of the gun on this one and answer this before the question pops up. âWhy isnât the dev fund being burned in the same % as the public emissions fund?â
The % may not be even, but the value is made up for 10 fold. Let me explain:
The % offset of total allocation is only achieved at full dilution. Thatâs not for another 8-10 years even after a 40% burn.
If we didnât burn anything, the part of the public emissions that is in question right now would not even be available to us for at least 8 years. However, the teams dev fund that is being cut is actually already available and will be fully available by March 2025.
The team is willing to cut their existing dev fund in almost half and risk having less funds to pay developers, team, and the people who actually build Minswap for the next 8-10 years. Although the percentage burn may not be exactly proportionate, the team is sacrificing more in allowing it to happen than we are. As it stands the dev fund is not used to farm, stake, or even vote as not to alter or dilute min holders. It is nothing more than a reserve fund that is used to pay people for their work and it is now being cut in half.
Thatâs just my take on it. The slight % in burn difference is made up for with the value of the availability of the token.
We may lose on a little MIN set to be released 8+ years from now, but the team is losing almost half of the MIN set to be released a year from now (and maybe even some that is already released depending on which they choose to burn).
At the same time it is not prudent cut too much of this reserve either. I would rather have a healthy and well funded protocol than one that is on its last legs and scrambling for funds from the treasury, etc. Have seen many DEXs that are in this situation or have been in this situation and they are down to their last legs.